Monday, July 6, 2009

Gateway LT3103u Review

I've been raving and posting about this machine for two days. So to be fair, I must say that I've only used the machine for two days. The battery has been fully cycled 4 times now, and I'm writing this on the fifth. So this will serve as more of an "initial reactions" review than anything else. Please keep that in mind.

Aesthetics

This is a beautiful machine. I definitely admire the way it looks. Classy, yet subtle enough to not draw too much attention. The subtle chrome accents give it a touch of class. The machine definitely doesn't look like it should cost 400 bones. I haven't taken it to any large social gatherings or to school yet, so I'll have to repost later when I do that. I can imagine that it will draw a bit of gawking and questioning.

However, the stunning visual aspect of the machine is not all peaches and cream. It looks great. Truely stunning little machine. When it's clean. Remember me mentioning that I still have the plastic on the unit's lid and screen bezel?


The first unit I purchased had fingerprints on the lid as I peeled the plastic off. The bezel absorbs fingerprints like a sponge. Every tiny adjustment you make to the screen leaves a trace. The glossy screen is the same way. I'd recommend bringing a nice microfiber towel with you everywhere this machine goes. If you don't care about fingerprints as much as I do, then do it for the machine's sake. Keep it clean, and it'll love you back!

By the way, I still haven't removed the plastic...I can't bring myself to do it yet. But eventually I'll have to.

Chassis

I am liking the size of this machine more and more as I use it. It's the exact size I was looking for in a notebook. It sits well on my desk, on my lap, and even in my hand. It's palmable just like my Aspire One, without being too small to comfortably sit on my lap. It's very well balanced as well. My Aspire One and even my larger laptop seem top heavy. When they sit on my lap, they tend to fall backwards unless I'm holding the palm rest with my wrist. That was quite possibly the largest gripe I had with my Aspire One.


My hands can rest on the bottom of the unit comfortably as I touch type with ease and speed. The large battery sticking out of the back gives it this advantage of stability that is hard to describe. It makes the unit hard to tip over backwards. I like it. I really thought I would hate the idea of a battery sticking out of the back of the machine, but I was very wrong. The advantages of the extended battery life, superior desk positioning, and stability far outweigh any aesthetic disadvantage.

So the final word on size and weight: perfectly balanced. Not too heavy or big, while not too small or light.

Display

My first unit had a bad screen, probably from damage in shipping. My second unit has a dead pixel. Bad luck? Probably, I usually have terrible luck anyway. Other than those problems, the screen is fantastic. Bright and extremely vivid. It's actually brighter at medium than my Acer 21" LCD at full. Glossy is usually not my style though, so I'll have to wait and see about that. So far my only gripe with the screen is with the glossy coating and its attraction to fingerprints and smudges. This machine is turning out to be a lot like my first gen PSP. Can't use it without fingerprinting it, so I carry a small cloth with it. But damn does it look nice.

The resolution on this monitor is amazing. It runs the same 1366 x 768 that my friend's Asus 15.6" gaming laptop uses. On an 11.6" screen? Talk about pixel density. I love it. The screen real estate bonus compared to a normal netbook (I have to compare it to my Aspire One, it replaced it) is astounding. In fact, posting on Blogger from the Aspire One was a chore. The text input box I'm using now barely fit on the screen on the One. At the moment it has white space to the right and on the bottom. I can dock two windows and type in this one while I watch Hulu in the one to the right. Overkill on a netbook? I like overkill.

Verdict: bright, vivid, dense, and crisp. But a bit smudgy. Don't forget to bring your towel!

Input

At the store and for the first few hours I thought the keyboard would take some getting used to. The keys have a very short stroke, but are spaced very much like a normal full sized keyboard. So if short stroke laptop keyboards aren't for you, then why are you reading this? Laptop keyboards are normally a problem for me. I can't seem to touch type on any laptop keyboard without screwing up very frequently. This one, however, I'm not finding errors very often. And I'm typing quite fast. The keys may not travel much, but they have great response. A nice subtle click from the scissor switches make fast typing a breeze.


A few other reviewers noted a bit of flex in the keyboard. This, I have not noticed. It is perfectly solid for me. But the machine is brand new. So only time will tell on that one.

The touchpad is another story however. I am a rigid mouse lover who refuses to play nicely with touchpads. I can use them, but I'd rather not if at all possible. This one is rather good though. Again, size comes into play. It is large enough to use comfortably, without accidentally hitting it while typing. On my Aspire One, I frequently hit the touchpad by accident and move entire lines of text without realizing it because it is simply too close to the keyboard. And turning the touchpad off and on becomes tiring if you do more than type for very long periods of time. I have only turned this touchpad off when on a desk using a mouse. By the way, I love ChiralMotion scrolling now.

One gripe with the touchpad is actually more of an aesthetic thing. The button(s) on it are plastic chrome, and it attracts fingerprints easily. And since I hit it constantly (because I turn tap to click off) it is always smudged. A quick swipe clears the smudges though, unlike the rest of the case.

I'm going to use the word usable often in this review. That's what they keyboard and touchpad are. Extremely usable. Moreso than any other netbook and most laptops I've used.

Performance

I can't be sure of what to classify this device as. It's raw numbers don't put it ahead of the Atom. The single threaded tests put it ahead, but the CrystalMark CPU scores the processor lower than the Atom. This is disappointing. And misleading.

Real world tests and experience are the factors that cannot be ruled out in a performance review and comparison. I can't give you the laptop and let you use it for two days to determine it for yourself. But if you have a Best Buy near you...by all means go and try it out for yourself.

It feels faster in every way. I don't wait for things to launch, even while multitasking. It doesn't seem to lag at all in every day applications. For instance, I can run Hulu SD video in a window, and browse the web at my leisure with no hiccups in the audio. In fact, as I type this, I am playing an episode of American Dad. I am also viewing my Picasa Web album for when I link pictures, viewing another review I wrote for consistency's sake, and reading a laptop review of an Acer Timeline on Notebookcheck.net. 5 tabs. CPU usage is at 50 - 65%. Playing a Hulu video and running several other heavy tabs. Launching IE8 with all of this took 2 seconds to a full MSN page. Nice.

I play a lot of games, so you knew there'd be a part in here for them. Can this thing rin Crysis at very high with 60+ fps? No. Get over it. What it will do, is help me get my fix when I'm away from my desktops. It gets 20+ fps in battlegrounds on World of Warcraft. In fact, Alterac Valley was churning out 10+ fps in large fights (20 people or more), and that's amazing. Questing and grinding rep/farming is very doable on this machine. Much more so than my Aspire One. I also installed Armadillo Run, an addictive little physics puzzle game, and it runs perfectly with everything maxed. Need for Speed Underground 2 runs well at minimum as well. I'll have to install Steam and try out my entire collection. Not like the hard drive isn't big enough :)


I'd really like to get a comparison of this processor to a Core 2 Solo from a Timeline notebook (the 13.3" Timeline was my other consideration, actually). I can't imagine the Core 2 Solo being much faster.

I do seem to be an AMD fanboy, so take what you will from this :)

Battery

From my limited experience I've measured 4 hours from full to nought with WiFi and screen at half brightness. This was usually with a Flash video playing constantly and my BT dongle plugged in. What more can I say about battery life on this machine? It's good for the amount of sheer usability I get out of it, but bad compared to other netbooks with 6 cell batteries. Does that help?

**Edit: Turning on "Power Saver" battery mode in Windows 7 makes the expected battery life jump up quite a bit.


I think that's all I can say right now. I'll have to post more as I use it more. Updates will probably come frequently. If anyone has a question or if you'd like me to snap another picture or two of it, I'm more than willing to help. It's a fantastic little machine, I do not regret this purchase at all.

Windows 7 boot and shutdown.

Completely fresh install. Updated and running very nicely.

Cold boot: 50 seconds to a launchable browser (40 seconds to a black screen with my BT mouse working)

Shutdown: 15 seconds to fully off.

Must be my slow hard drive then eh? I guess a nice 7200RPM drive is in this machine's future. Or a shiny new SSD perhaps?

My full review is still cooking, simmering if you will. Should be up later tonight to give the big picture. I'm finishing up my (semi-formal) battery tests now.

Windows 7 time.

Just loaded my fresh 64 bit files onto a bootable USB drive. I'll see how this goes before writing any more of my formal review. Shouldn't take long. Hopefully I can use the D2D Recovery system from within Windows 7 if all doesn't go according to plan. I don't have an external DVD burner, unfortunately.

**Edit: Went smoothly as expected.


Scale increases, overall score decreases. Saddening. And odd. Apparently Scott Carmichael at Gadling got something slightly different.

I have a few tests to run.

Sunday, July 5, 2009

LT3103u Benchmarks

These were done after a cold boot, with nothing running in the background.

CrystalMark 2004R3

SuperPi


From what I've seen online, the Athlon in this Gateway wins by a large amount over an Atom 1.6 on the SuperPi score, but gets stomped in the CrystalMark score. Because of the HyperThreading support in CrystalMark I believe.

**Edit - for comparison I also ran a 1M SuperPi on my Acer Travelmate 2420 with a Celeron M 1.6GHz (1MB L2 cache). It scored 57s.

All I know is, the Gateway feels much faster than my Aspire One. HyperThreading doesn't matter if you're still waiting for 20 seconds for something to happen. With the handicap of Vista the Gateway still feels so much more alive and peppy. Even while multitasking.

Now, I'm no professional by any means, so keep that in mind.

Any others? Let me know.

Gateway LT3103u - fresh photo op

Excuse my dusty work area please! :)

I'm starting to love this lap... netbook. Funny story here actually. When I purchased the little thing from Best Buy yesterday (yeah I know..who goes to Best Buy on the fourth of July?), the nice sales girl who helped me warned me several times that this was in fact a "netbook" and not a "full fledged notebook." I then conversed with her over why I was interested in this particular model over say, a HP Mini or EEE PC.

Speaking of Best Buy. Buying the unit and exchanging the unit were a breeze. It took zero time to find someone to help me, and she knew her stuff. Then checking out was painless and fast. The exchange went without a single hitch. The assosciate and a geek squad member even booted the machine and apologized for the screen as we joked about how manufacturers should have higher quality standards. By far the best (see what I did there?) experience I've had at a Best Buy store.

I'm starting to doubt the netbook classification it carries. I have been using it this entire time. Using it in pictures, then opening it up quickly and editing or uploading the pictures. It performs like any other notebook I've used. Honestly, if you gave me absolutely zero specifications on the unit and gave it to me to test, I would have called it a laptop, not a netbook. The size, however, shows it to be a netbook. The specs classify it as a netbook. But it is simply far more usable than any netbook I've tried, including the 10" EEE series and HP Mini's. I need to start writing my full review now. After I get some benchmarks quickly. Until then, enjoy the pictures!

Boot and shutdown.

Timed them after I finished de-bloating the Vista Basic install.

Cold boot: 52 seconds to a desktop with launchable browser and working BT mouse.

Shutdown, nothing running: 12 seconds to fully off.

This is after I removed the bloatware, ouch. The apps I removed include: Google Desktop, Google Toolbar for IE, Microsoft Works, Microsoft Office Home and Student trial, Adobe Reader, Norton Internet Security, Microsoft Powerpoint Viewer, and a few other small things.

Things I've installed since then: updated Catalyst Control Center and drivers, Google Chrome, VLC, CPUz, HWMonitor, World of Warcraft, and Amadillo Run. Also threw a USB BT dongle in and I'm using my Apple BT Mighty Mouse. The glossy white mouse doesn't match the gloss/matte black of the Gateway. Guess I'll have to invest in a Logitech VX Nano soon :)

A return to the norm.

I've paused my intense WoW playing for a short time to write some.

I bought a new netbook, again. I'm ditching the Acer Aspire One for my brand new (plastic still on it, but more on that later) Gateway LT3103u. Picked it up from Best Buy today for the low price of $399.99. Actually, I picked it up yesterday. The unit I purchased had a stuck pixel and the right side of the screen looked as if it had pressure damage. The exchange took 10 minutes though. Very pleasant experience. There were only two units when I went in yesterday, and I've had both of them. I almost feel bad about it. Now no one else can buy one. I'm so selfish.

Not all great though. This unit has a dead pixel too. Fortunately, it isn't a stuck red pixel in the middle like the last one. This time it more subtle. It just looks like a small spec of dust. I don't notice it until I look for it now.

A formal review will come later. But just so I remember later I'll throw some numbers out there.

I've been using the, let's say netbook, all day. I'm at 30% battery and Vista says 55 minutes remaining. I believe it for once. The battery doesn't want to die. I was even playing WoW on it earlier. More on that later too. I was uninstalling all of the bloat and updating for a while earlier too. All on battery. I'd estimate around 3:40-4 hours with WiFi on and brightness at medium. I'll have to do a more scientific test some time. But the battery life so far has blown away my Aspire One with it's 3-cell. And performance-wise...

I'll gush about that later too. Hopefully with some benchmarks.

As I type this I have Hulu in another tab playing an episode of American Dad flawlessly. My Celeron M 1.6GHz laptop can't even do that. My Aspire One couldn't play Hulu at all without stuttering. Color me impressed.