Monday, July 6, 2009
Windows 7 time.
Sunday, July 5, 2009
LT3103u Benchmarks
**Edit - for comparison I also ran a 1M SuperPi on my Acer Travelmate 2420 with a Celeron M 1.6GHz (1MB L2 cache). It scored 57s.
Gateway LT3103u - fresh photo op
Excuse my dusty work area please! :)
I'm starting to love this lap... netbook. Funny story here actually. When I purchased the little thing from Best Buy yesterday (yeah I know..who goes to Best Buy on the fourth of July?), the nice sales girl who helped me warned me several times that this was in fact a "netbook" and not a "full fledged notebook." I then conversed with her over why I was interested in this particular model over say, a HP Mini or EEE PC.
Speaking of Best Buy. Buying the unit and exchanging the unit were a breeze. It took zero time to find someone to help me, and she knew her stuff. Then checking out was painless and fast. The exchange went without a single hitch. The assosciate and a geek squad member even booted the machine and apologized for the screen as we joked about how manufacturers should have higher quality standards. By far the best (see what I did there?) experience I've had at a Best Buy store.
I'm starting to doubt the netbook classification it carries. I have been using it this entire time. Using it in pictures, then opening it up quickly and editing or uploading the pictures. It performs like any other notebook I've used. Honestly, if you gave me absolutely zero specifications on the unit and gave it to me to test, I would have called it a laptop, not a netbook. The size, however, shows it to be a netbook. The specs classify it as a netbook. But it is simply far more usable than any netbook I've tried, including the 10" EEE series and HP Mini's. I need to start writing my full review now. After I get some benchmarks quickly. Until then, enjoy the pictures!
Boot and shutdown.
A return to the norm.
I bought a new netbook, again. I'm ditching the Acer Aspire One for my brand new (plastic still on it, but more on that later) Gateway LT3103u. Picked it up from Best Buy today for the low price of $399.99. Actually, I picked it up yesterday. The unit I purchased had a stuck pixel and the right side of the screen looked as if it had pressure damage. The exchange took 10 minutes though. Very pleasant experience. There were only two units when I went in yesterday, and I've had both of them. I almost feel bad about it. Now no one else can buy one. I'm so selfish.
Thursday, April 23, 2009
24 hours a day.
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
It's quad core from here on out.
I'm a multitasker. I NEED four cores, really. At any given point of my computer usage, which is running near 24/7 (seriously), I have more than 3 programs I'm cycling through constantly. And I'm not talking about browser windows here. Although, I usually keep at least two or three, each with several tabs, open. I'm talking about hard hitting programs. Visual Studio 2008 is running nearly all the time, along with WoW, and VLC playing some video file. Add to that my browsers, Digsby, Steam, and other random programs, and you've got a computer that's utilizing its maximum 4gb of DDR2 on a regular basis.
Why do I do this, you ask? Well, like I said, multitasking. I'm always doing something in WoW, so that one is pretty much a given these days. Whether I'm questing or farming or just chatting, it's always running and I'm always logged in. I keep Visual Studio 2008 open at all times in case I get a bit of inspiration for a project I'm working on. Like my computer, my brain never stops working, so having it close by is essential. And VLC is another given. I like movies. And animated shows. Easy enough.
The ability to have all that crap open is not entirely why I feel a quad core is necessary, however. It's the speed at which I can access each individual program. Alt-tabbing needs to be instant and stutter free. Lag kills me. Waiting for something to render in a window is unacceptable, especially if it's in RAM. When I alt-tab to VS2008, it needs to pop up instantly. On my Phenom, it does. On my Athlon X2 box, it doesn't.
Don't get my wrong, my Athlon X2 box (the one I just built and made a custom case for) is plenty quick. It plays games very well, but it isn't a workhorse like this one. I don't leave many programs running on that box, simply because it can't handle that many things. Partially the 2gb of RAM to blame there. I have noticed that recently I've WANTED to stay at school simply so I could keep using my Phenom box that's parked on my desk here instead of the Athlon X2 box at home. Even though my Athlon box has a better graphics card.
Therefore, I have to agree with nearly all internet tech writers for once.